The jurors deliberated for four days, eventually agreeing on five designs. (Some illustrations in this story highlight sections of the complete drawingboards.) Moore said that each entry consisted of two boards - one showing a plan and elevation view and the other showing a prospective view or vignettes of what it would look like. Others don’t seem to embody the ideas of the memorial - that Saarinen’s did - of being a gateway.’’Ĭredit National Park Service / Jefferson National Expansion Memorial Entry from Frank Weise, Brewster Adams and Gyo Obata. “One looks like a giant outdoor movie screen. “And then some, well, it’s hard to fathom what they were thinking,’’ Moore said. Others suggested forms reminiscent of well-known monuments around the world. Some of the architects included big statuary of Thomas Jefferson, pioneers, American Indians and buffalo. Louis a campfire theater where park rangers could give programs restaurants, museums and possibly a helipad and port docking facility. The criteria called for an architectural memorial of some type reproductions of the types of buildings found in Old St. Moore says they were, in fact, meeting the competition’s guidelines, which required that certain elements be incorporated into the design. While Saarinen went BIG with his arch, many of the architects kept their eyes at ground level and focused on curious little elements like open-air campfire theaters and “villages” of French colonial houses. There Was Supposed To Be A Campfire Theater. In the meantime, here are five things you might not know about the selection of the Arch design:ġ. Credit National Park Service / Jefferson National Expansion Memorial The monument proposed by Eliel Saarinen, Eero's father, who also entered the competition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |